Journal
Published 25/02/2026
Cycladic idols
In the sculptures of the Neolithic Cycladic period, the human body is rendered in the simplest of outlines. The majority of Cycladic idols are depicted in standing pose, with legs together and arms by their sides. The limbs are separated from the body with incised lines, sometimes with additional details of an incised line for a spine, or a triangular outline of the pubic region. The heads sit atop slender necks, generally with only a triangular nose sculpted (although research has shown the other facial features were often painted on). The meaning and use of these figures remains uncertain, and is likely to have changed over the five centuries in which they were produced.Although some scholars have suggested the idols were linked to fertility and a ‘Great Mother’ goddess – certain figures have modelled breasts and even a rounded stomach, suggesting pregnancy (image reference above) – many Cycladic sculptures present an androgyny, or a clear masculinity, that defies this. Other scholars have theorised that the idols may have been produced for funerary or apotropaic purposes.
Fertility Figures

Female Idol, Syro-Hittite, 2000-1500 B.C. Image courtesy David Aaron
Anatolian Idols
At the other end of the abstract scale exists the Kusura Type, also referred to as ‘violin idols’ due to their resemblance to the string instrument. These near two-dimensional figures feature ovoid forms at either end (the ‘head’ and ‘body’), with two triangular projections or ‘arms’ on either side of a slender ‘neck’.
Although each of these figures were crafted by disparate cultures at different times and geographical locations, there is a clear thread of commonality stretching between them. From the marble works of a group of small Greek islands, to the terracotta sculptures of inland Iran, to the highly stylised creations of ancient Anatolia, abstract and abstracted idols represent humanity’s quest to capture its own image.
In their most reduced state, these idols still retain the essence of the body: a head, limbs, and torso. Even when representations are removed from naturalism, our modern eyes can easily recognise these idols as the image of our ancient counterparts. Whatever the specific purposes for which these figures were created, they all represent a common drive to record the human form in art. The enduring legacy produced by these idols continues to inspire artists to this day, and remains one of the few extant pieces of evidence that allows us to engage with ancient civilisations.

Pre-Dynastic Female Idol. Naqada II, Pre-Dynastic period, c.3600-3300 B.C., Egypt. Image: Courtesy David Aaron
Published 16/02/2026
Dated to circa 375-350 B.C., the marble grave stele from the historic Attic region is exceptionally carved in high relief, depicting a young female figure with her right hand raised elegantly towards her shoulder as if holding an object.
Notably, a single line of inscription in the architrave identifies the subject of the piece as a young girl called Medeia.
The subject is depicted within an architectural frame composed of antae – rectangular pillars found in classical Greek and Roman architecture – supporting a horizontal architrave with staggered antefixes pointing upwards above the figure.

The rarity of a parthenos stele
The term ‘parthenoi’ was used to refer to Greek women in the brief transitional stage between childhood and entry into adulthood through marriage; this brevity means their depictions on Attic stelae are scarce. Swiss classical archaeologist Christoph W. Clairmont’s seminal research on Attic tombs further supports the rarity of parthenoi stelae, as they make up only 4% of the funerary reliefs examined across his eight-volume publication.The stele’s subject is recognisable due to her traditional chiton dress: a finely draped tunic, belted around the waist with a back mantle and fastened at the shoulders with large circular brooches. Her distinctive attire marks her as a parthenos, or unmarried young woman.
The importance of parthenoi is reflected in the fine funerary monuments dedicated to them; these monuments form the basis of art historian and archaeologist Linda Jones Roccos’ theory that the death of a parthenos was significant from both a personal and societal perspective, as it removed the possibility of future children being born to support the Athenian cause.
Attic Marble Stelae
Attic marble stelae, produced primarily during the Classical period of ancient Greece, often feature high-relief sculptures depicting the departed in scenes reflecting their societal roles and personal identities. Representations of parthenoi on stelae are particularly poignant and provide valuable insights into Athenian beliefs about life, death, and memory.
Parthenos stelae often portray the deceased in moments of quiet reflection or domestic activity, emphasising their roles within the household and society. At times, a parthenos will be depicted holding an object to reflect their personal interests, such as a book. In the Stele of Medeia, the fingers of the raised hand are curved, as if holding something – Clairmont suggests that she may originally have been holding a painted object that has since worn away.
Several museums house exemplary Attic stelae representing or dedicated to parthenoi. The National Archaeological Museum in Athens features the stele of Neike, daughter of Eirenaios (pictured above), which presents the deceased in a dignified pose, reflecting her status and virtues. Similarly, The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York holds a marble stele from the mid-4th century B.C., depicting a seated woman with a standing attendant, capturing the intimacy and solemnity characteristic of such memorials.

Example of a Marble stele of a young woman and servant, c. 400–390 B.C., The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
A story of distinguished provenance
The Stele of Medeia was first recorded in the collection of noted Athenian art dealer Theodoros A. Zoumpoulakis, before being acquired in 1923 by renowned gallerist Joseph Brummer, and remaining with the Brummer family for more than half a century.The Brummers acquired more than 550 pieces from Zoumpoulakis between 1924 and 1946. Many pieces that passed through Zoumpoulakis’s hands are now in major museums around the world, including the Walters Art Museum; Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; The Metropolitan Museum of Art; J. Paul Getty Museum; and the British Museum. A grave stele of a woman much like this example, which was with Zoumpoulakis in 1933, is now in the Saint Louis Art Museum, Missouri (pictured below).
Joseph Brummer established the gallery business in Paris in 1910, with his brothers joining shortly afterwards. In 1914, Joseph and Imre emigrated to New York and established a gallery on 57th Street, rapidly joining the pre-eminent dealers of their time. Meanwhile, Ernest continued the business in Paris and expanded to two locations. From 1924 onwards, the brothers engaged in a transatlantic partnership operating the businesses between New York and Paris.

Joseph Brummer
In a rare administrative quirk, Zoumpoulakis is often referred to as Edward Zoumpoulakis in the Brummer records, and in some of the museums they traded pieces to. This was due to an error in the Brummer’s inventory cards (pictured below), likely based on Zoumpoulakis’s gallery's location on Edward Law Street.
Brummer Gallery dealer card for Zoumpoulakis The Metropolitan Museum of Art acquired a significant amount of Joseph's private collection after his passing.

Extensive publication history
The Stele for Medeia has been featured in a number of notable publications and sales catalogues over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries. Scholarly interest in the piece has been sustained across decades. Christoph W. Clairmont discussed the stele in his seminal work, Classical Attic Tombstones, vol. 1. It is further referenced by Johannes Bergemann in Demos und Thanatos and by Linda Jones Roccos in her article ‘Back-Mantle and Peplos. The Special Costume of Greek Maidens in 4th-Century Funerary and Votive Reliefs’.
More recently, the stele has been revisited by Katia Margariti in her monograph The Death of the Maiden in Classical Athens and in her article ‘Lament and Death instead of Marriage. The Iconography of Deceased Maidens on Attic Grave Reliefs of the Classical Period’.

The Death of the Maiden in Classical Athens by Katia Margariti
This rare Greek grave stele is an exceptional museum-quality monument whose beauty is matched only by its cultural significance. The Stele will be on display in David Aaron’s TEFAF Maastricht stand, number 804, from 14 – 19 March 2026
Published 11/02/2026
On a brisk morning in Mayfair, a group of year three and four students gathered around the Carrara Triceratops Skull sculpture to meet Paul Vanstone and hear him speak about how he made the sculpture and how he got his start as an artist. Paul shared inspiring messages with the students about his pursuit of a career as an artist starting as a child with his love for making things with his hands.
Paul Vanstone speaking to students at the event. Photo: Pauliina Roots Westminster City Council supporting arts and education
In attendance at the event were Westminster City Council (WCC) representatives Aicha Less, Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Children and Public Protection; her daughter Councillor Iman Less; and fellow Councillor Patrick Lilley. The Councillors spoke to the students about the WCC’s role in supporting education and access to public art in the Mayfair area, including the Carrara Triceratops Skull.
The installation of the sculpture has been part‑funded through the Council’s Neighbourhood Community Infrastructure Levy (NCIL), which supports projects that enhance community spaces across Westminster.
In a delightful coincidence Councillor Iman Less attended the same primary school as our guests, and both Iman and Aicha spoke to the students about their wonderful experiences being involved in the school.
Following Paul's talk, the students participated in an origami Triceratops making workshop in the gallery led by the David Aaron team, inspired by the Triceratops sculpture. The students enthusiastically worked together to make colourful origami artworks to take home as mementos of their visit.
We are grateful to the Westminster City Council and the primary school for joining us at the gallery for this joyful celebration of art and education.
Triceratops origami making activity. Photo: Pauliina Roots
Triceratops origami making activity. Photo: Pauliina Roots
Triceratops origami making activity. Photo: Pauliina Roots
Triceratops origami making activity. Photo: Pauliina Roots
Published 05/02/2026
David Aaron has been exhibiting at TEFAF Maastricht since 2022 and will once again present a suite of significant pieces of antiquity with exceptional provenance and condition spanning Roman, Greek, Egyptian, and Near Eastern cultures.
Stele of MedeiaHighlights will include a remarkable rare Greek stele dated circa 375-350 B.C. - one of very few surviving examples dedicated to a Parthenos, a young Athenian woman of marriageable age who has not yet wed.
What makes this work extraordinary is its rarity. The term Parthenoi refers to the brief transitional period between childhood and entry into adulthood through marriage making depictions on Greek stele scarce and the number of known Parthenoi steles make up a very small percentage of academia studying the subject matter.

Torso of a Youth

Limestone Baboon
Finally, David Aaron will present an Egyptian Limestone Baboon from 664-343 B.C., 26th-30th Dynasty, Late Period. Baboons were highly regarded in ancient Egypt as an embodiment of Thoth, god of the moon and also as an adviser to Ra the sun god. This particular piece is dedicated to the role of the baboon in the rising and setting of the sun, we know this because the baboon’s arms are positioned outstretched in solar worship.
For further updates on our TEFAF Maastricht presentation sign up to our enew via the ‘Join Mailing List’ link at the bottom of our website.
Published 02/02/2026
The new installation is a unique collaboration between Mayfair art gallery David Aaron and acclaimed figurative sculptor Paul Vanstone who took inspiration from a 68-million-year-old Triceratops skull exhibited by the gallery at Frieze Masters 2025 in Regent’s Park. Carving the piece over 60 days from a 10-tonne block of marble, the artist has reinterpreted a prehistoric icon through modern craftsmanship for Mayfair locals and visitors to enjoy for the next two years.
The Triceratops sculpture marks the second occasion that David Aaron has presented a sculpture inspired by a dinosaur in Berkeley Square – in 2023 a bronze juvenile Tyrannosaurus Rex sculpture, affectionately known as the Berkeley Square T Rex, was displayed in the Square. The bronze took inspiration from a fossil called Chomper which David Aaron presented at Frieze Masters that same year.

Official unveiling
David Aaron hosted special guest Paul Vanstone, representatives from the Westminster City Council, collaborators involved in the making of the sculpture and valued supporters of the artist and gallery for the celebration.
Guests in attendance were treated to an in conversation with Vanstone, hosted by one of David Aaron’s Directors Jonathan Aaron, where the audience heard about the artist’s process in selecting the white Carrara marble on a trip to Italy, the challenges of carving a sculpture at such a grand scale and his inspiration for the artwork.

Paul Vanstone speaks at the unveiling of Vanstone’s 'Carrara Triceratops Skull' sculpture with Mayfair art gallery David Aaron. Photo: Gabrielle Thomas
The display of the sculpture was made possible through the generous support of the Westminster City Council’s Berkeley Square Public Art program which included the allocation of the space and installation of a new electrical system allowing for a state of the art lighting system to illuminate the sculpture throughout the evening, creating a decidedly different viewing experience to seeing the white marble in the daylight.
David Aaron was delighted to host the Council’s Lord Mayor Locum Tenens, Honorary Alderman Frances Blois and Councillor Patrick Lilley who spoke at the event about the importance of access to public art for the local community and visitors to the area.

Westminster City Council Lord Mayor Locum Tenens, Honorary Alderman Frances Blois; Jonathan Aaron, Director, David Aaron; and Councillor Patrick Lilley at the unveiling of Vanstone’s 'Carrara Triceratops Skull' sculpture with Mayfair art gallery David Aaron. Photo: Gabrielle Thomas
Especially for the event Vanstone displayed two smaller studies of the Triceratops skull carved in a ghostly alabaster, demonstrating the process of developing the form of the Triceratops’ iconic horns.
Throughout the evening images and videos of the artist’s creative process were displayed for guests to gained a greater understanding of how Vanstone made the sculpture.
Paul Vanstone’s Carrara Triceratops Skull is now on display in Berkeley Square, Mayfair.

Paul Vanstone and guests at the unveiling of Vanstone’s 'Carrara Triceratops Skull' sculpture with Mayfair art gallery David Aaron. Photo: Gabrielle Thomas

Published 19/12/2025
Read time: 3min
Titled Carrara Triceratops Skull, 2025, Vanstone took inspiration from a 68-million-year-old sub-adult Triceratops from the Late Cretaceous Period, exhibited by David Aaron at Frieze Masters 2025. The public artwork was unveiled on 16 December as part of Westminster City Council’s Berkeley Square Public Art Programme.
Gleaming during the day and illuminated at night, visitors to Mayfair will have the opportunity to experience the Carrara Triceratops Skull for the next two years.
David Aaron is honoured to present this unique collaboration with Vanstone and introduce new audiences to not only his exceptional craftsmanship but also the joy of this iconic Triceratops form.
Paul Vanstone the artist
Following his studies at Central Saint Martins and the Royal College of Art, Vanstone went on to work in renowned marble carving studios near the Carrara quarries of Italy, as well as in Berlin and Rajasthan, before spending five years working as an assistant to leading British sculptor Anish Kapoor.
It was in Kapoor’s studio that Vanstone first worked in large scale sculpture with one of his first assignments being a 30-tonne sculpture. These years of hands-on experience and dedication to his craft prepared Vanstone for this singular commission.
Vanstone’s practice is material led working in stone from onyx, alabaster and marble sourced primarily from Italy, Portugal, and India. The material leads the direction of the work - the colour, the veining – and from there Vanstone develops the subject.
This commission signals a departure from Vanstone’s usual human subject inspiration and presented an opportunity and challenge to explore more natural forms through his practice.
Vanstone works out of a workshop in West London where he has established a not-for-profit community space which accommodates studio spaces for 50 artists.
Making Carrara Triceratops Skull
The starting point for the making of Carrara Triceratops Skull was the real Triceratops skull fossil on display at David Aaron in Mayfair. Vanstone visited the fossil multiple times and sited experiencing the power and presence of the 68-million-year-old specimen as integral to informing his work. The volume and scale of the fossil as well as the iconic features such as the horns, the beak and the striking eyes left an impression with the artist.
During his visits Vanstone took photographs and sketches to inform the design of the sculpture and uniquely uses watercolours in his practice to make preparatory illustrations drafting the flow of the sculpture’s form.

From here Vanstone travelled to Carrara in Italy to visit marble stock yards and source the perfect stone for the project. While Vanstone often works in marble with strong veining, he decided that something different was needed for this project.
Vanstone selected a beautiful 10-tonne block of white Carrara marble with a very subtle veining that had a chalky, bonelike quality. Vanstone likened the white marble to a blank canvas from which he could carve the dinosaur into.

Over 60 days the artist carved the sculpture in his West London workshop alongside his colleague Liam Winship. To start they began hollowing out the frill at the back of the sculpture and then moved onto the beak and other defining features of the skull. The nearly haunting essence of the fossil’s eyes were particularly alluring for Vanstone and the lines radiating from the eyes are translated in the carving of the sculpture.
To finalise the sculpture was a lengthy polishing process which took around three weeks of hand polishing to complete the finish.


Magic in Mayfair
This unique artistic collaboration is the second public artwork presented by David Aaron in Mayfair, the first being a bronze sculpture inspired by a rare juvenile Tyrannosaurus Rex called ‘Chomper’ which was created in collaboration with a German foundry.
Dinosaurs continue to hold a unique position in the public imagination, embodying both awe and nostalgia. This collaboration between David Aaron and Paul Vanstone brings the monumental presence of a Triceratops into the heart of London, offering a bold reimagining of prehistoric form through modern craftsmanship.
Paul Vanstone’s Carrara Triceratops Skull will remain on display for the next two years.
Find out more about Paul Vanstone’s practice here: https://www.paulvanstone.co.uk/
Published 21/10/2025
Read time: 2min

The Goddess by a Greywacke Master, an important Egyptian bust dating from the Reign of Pharaoh Amasis, circa 570 – 526 B.C
Our exhibition highlight was The Goddess by the Greywacke Master, an exquisite example of Egyptian sculpture attributed to an anonymous artist, the Greywacke Master, and dated to the reign of Amasis (c. 570-526 B.C.). The piece captivated visitors with its presence, fine detail and intriguing provenance from misattribution to rediscovery.
“Frieze Masters is always a pleasure to be part of. It is an exciting fair that draws an interesting, and, interested crowd of collectors, curators and art enthusiasts.” Salomon Aaron, Director
We would like to thank Emanuela Tarizzo, Director of Frieze Masters, as well as everyone at FRIEZE, Stabilo and all the contractors who worked tirelessly to bring our stand to life. We look forward to returning next year to continue sharing our passion for exceptional works from the ancient and natural worlds.
Published 18/07/2025
Read time: 4min
As we begin preparations for Frieze Masters 2025, we wanted to take a moment to reflect on one of the stand-out pieces from our stand last year, a rediscovered royal coffin that attracted widespread public and media interest.
Exhibited under the title 'The Forgotten Princess', the coffin was the centrepiece for our Frieze Masters 2024 display. Its presence drew significant attention, not only for its beauty and intricate detailing, but because it is the only known royal Egyptian sarcophagus to have appeared on the art market.
In 2025, the coffin is once again on public display, this time as part of the Making Egypt exhibition at the Young V&A, where visitors can view this exceptional object in person. Its presence not only brings ancient history into focus, but also underlines the value of sustained research, conservation, and responsible curation in the rediscovery of lost narratives.

The Forgotton Princess on display at Frieze Masters, 2024. Photo credit David Owens / co The Art Newspaper
The Forgotten Princess: Early Egyptologists
In 2014, a handwritten note was found on the inner base of the coffin, dating back to the early nineteenth-century:
‘Decouverte à Sakara en 1832 / rapportée d’egypte par M J de Breuv[ery] / En 1834’ (‘Discovered in Saqqara in 1832, removed from Egypt by M. J de Breuvery in 1834’)

The handwritten note can be seen on the inside of the base of the coffin.
The ‘M J Breuv[ery]’ in the note is Monsieur Jules Xavier Saguez de Breuvery (1805-1876), a French archaeologist who travelled the Near East, Egypt and Sudan with Édouard Pierre Marie de Cadalvène, between 1829 and 1832. De Breuvery and de Cadalvène published an account of their journey in four volumes, including their social and political commentary on the Ottoman Empire.
In 1829, de Breuvery and de Cadalvène began their journey through Egypt at Alexandria. They spent some time in the city, visiting sites such as Pompey’s Pillar and Cleopatra’s Needles. From here, they set out to Rosetta and Fuwwah, before continuing on to Damietta, where they began their journey down the Nile. Whilst staying in Cairo, the pair toured the pyramids of Giza, Heliopolis, and other notable regions from antiquity. They continued on to Faiyum and to the famous tombs at Beni Hasan, then down towards Abydos, Qurna, where they travelled to the temple at Denderra, before arriving at Thebes:
"Before us lay the immense plain which the ancient metropolis of Egypt covered with its countless buildings. Here and there rose on both banks of the Nile these gigantic ruins before which our republican phalanxes clapped their hands or presented arms, by a spontaneous movement, as if these ruins communicated an involuntary enthusiasm, as if they had a language intelligible to all." (translated) J. de Breuvery and Ed. de Cadalvène, L’Égypte et La Nubie (Paris, 1841), pp. 310-11
They explored much of the region around Thebes, visiting the temple at Karnak, the Ramesseum, the Valley of Kings, Medinet Habu, El-Assassif, and the city of Luxor. They sailed down the Nile past the temples of Esna, Edfu, and Kom Ombo, and through Aswan and Elephantine into what is now Sudan. Their tour then passed through Khartoum, Gebel Adda, Wadi Halfa, and Dongola, to Kordofan. From Kordofan they returned northwards, back to Saqqara. De Breuvery and de Cadalvène’s comprehensive itinerary reveals their keen interest in Egypt and its ancient history, and they even took care to describe the condition of the antiquities they saw on their route.
De Breuvery made several purchases of antiquities during their journey, several of which were inscribed with similar handwritten notes recording the dates he acquired them. Among the objects he brought back to his home at Saint-Germain-en-Laye in France are a caryatide statue from Halicarnassus (Musée du Louvre, Paris, MNC 1382) and the coffin of Princess Sopdet-em-haawt.
De Breuvery and de Cadalvène met many contemporary Egyptologists, archaeologists, and other travellers during their travels. For instance, they met famous explorer and early Egyptologist Robert Hay (1799-1863) at Beni Hasan.
"Mr. Hay, a wealthy English traveller and enthusiastic admirer of Egyptian architecture, was at Beny-Hassan when we arrived, busy carefully drawing the hieroglyphic paintings which decorate the speos of the mountain." (translated) De Breuvery and de Cadalvène, L’Égypte et La Nubie, p. 431.
Hay transcribed the paintings on the Speos Artemidos into one of his meticulous notebooks, where he also recorded a portion of the inscriptions on the coffin of Princess Sopdet-em-haawt. Hay recorded the coffin between 1829 and 1834, when he was living in the village of Gournah in the Theban area. Hay’s drawings, paintings, plans, notebooks and diaries are now in the collection of the British Library, including this notebook (Add.MSS.29827, fol. 83 verso).
Modern Rediscovery
In December 2013, the coffin was sold at Sotheby’s, New York. At this time, the coffin had remained closed, and the details of the internal hieroglyphics and the pencil note remained undiscovered. Still, the coffin had already sparked the interest of several scholars.
In 2009, when the coffin’s whereabouts were not public knowledge and using only the transcribed inscription in Hay’s notebook, Raphaële Meffre traced the lineage of Princess Sopdet-em-haawt in her article ‘Une Princesse Héracléopolitaine de l’Époque Libyenne: Sopdet(em)haaout’ (Revue d’Égyptologie, 60 (2009), pp. 215-221). As a descendant of two Libyan kings, the princess’s coffin can be dated to either the very end of the 25th Dynasty or, more likely, the beginning of the 26th. Sopdet-em-haawt was married to a member of one of the most important Theban families; her husband was involved in the cults of Amun and of Montu, whose priests were among the most influential people in Thebes from the end of the Libyan Period to the 26th Dynasty.
However, it was not until 2014 when the coffin was painstakingly cleaned, conserved, and opened by conservators that much of the internal hieroglyphs became visible, and the incredibly well-preserved striped interior inscriptions were uncovered. The new discoveries prompted Meffre to study the coffin in greater detail. In 2015, she published a complete, 54-page translation of the coffin’s internal and external inscriptions (‘Le cercueil intérieur de la princesse Sopdet-em-hââout et la famille des rois Roudamon et Peftjaouâuybastet’, Monuments et mémoires de la Fondation Eugène Piot, 94 (2015), pp. 7-59).
The Princess Sopdet-em-haawt lived during a pivotal regime shift between the end of the Third Intermediate Period and the establishment of the Late Period. Her coffin is highly important in expanding our knowledge of workshops in the Theban area at the beginning of the Late Period. This, alongside the extremely well-preserved decoration, given new life through extensive conservation, and the rediscovered nineteenth-century provenance, makes the coffin of Sopdet-em-haawt a truly unique example of an ancient Egyptian coffin on the market today.
Making Egypt - Exhibition at Young V&A
The coffin of Princess Sopdet-em-haawt is on view as part of Making Egypt, the major new exhibition at the Young V&A, running until 2 November 2025. The exhibition offers a rare chance to examine the coffin's beautifully preserved decoration up close, including the striking internal yellow and white stripes, and reflects on how ancient Egypt has influenced art, design and popular culture today.

The inner sarcophagus of Princess Sopdet-em-haawt on view as part of Making Egypt, Young V&A, 2025. Courtesy Victoria and Albert Museum, London. Photo: David Parry
Published 25/06/2025
Read time: 2min
"The sale of this extraordinary skeleton to the Natural History Museum is a true honour," says Salomon Aaron, director of David Aaron. "This specimen allows for further important research into what we understand about dinosaur species and adds a significant chapter to the Museum's rich tapestry of natural history."

The Enigmacursor on display at the Natural History Museum, London. (Image credit: Lucie Goodayle, The Natural History Museum)
But following in depth research led by the Natural History Museum’s palaeontology team, the specimen has now been confirmed as a distinct and newly recognised species. It is also thought there are signs that the dinosaur was not fully grown, says co-lead research author Professor Paul Barrett.
“One feature we look at in dinosaurs are the neural arches,” Paul explains. “These are the top section of vertebrae, and form separately from the lower parts. They gradually merge as an animal gets older, so by examining them you can see whether it was still growing.”

Conservation and analysis of the Enigmarcusor taking place at the Natural History Museum (Image credit: The Natural History Museum)
We are honoured to have played a part in the journey of this rare fossil and proud to have helped it find its permanent home in the halls of the Natural History Museum.
Published 30/05/2025
The bronze falcon of Horus in traditional standing pose makes a striking silhouette: with two firmly planted legs counterbalanced by an elegant V-shaped tail, wings folded across the back which rises smoothly to the bird’s proud head. The falcon’s feathers were individually chased onto its finished and polished surface by hand, using a fine-pointed iron tool. The intricacy of this work, with care taken to individuate the different kinds of flight feathers present in a real bird’s wings and tail, would have required a large investment of time and skill.

The Hultmark Horus, 663-525 B.C., Saitic Period, Egypt , Bronze, Image: Courtesy David Aaron
The pointed tip of the beak and the sharp, viciously curved claws on the feet are also painstakingly modelled. The combination of the detailed naturalistic treatment of the subject, and the technical skills required for lost-wax casting a piece of this kind in a single piece, mark this falcon as a fine example of Late Period metalwork. Unusually, the falcon’s legs were modelled together with the body – the majority of Late Period bronze falcons of this kind were produced in two pieces and attached after the casting stage – an innovative production process that would have streamlined the piece’s production.

The Hultmark Horus, 663-525 B.C., Saitic Period, Egypt , Bronze, Image: Courtesy David Aaron
From the Late Period onwards, the sacred animals of the gods became a focus for cult practices and were worshipped as living incarnations of the gods on earth. They were often kept in temple precincts – entire complexes of buildings dedicated to Horus falcons have been found at Saqqara, Buto, Abydos, and Kom Ombo. Pilgrims who visited these temples would purchase falcons to be mummified and presented as signs of devotion to the god, or when seeking a particular blessing. Their offerings would then be interred in the catacombs as an eternal prayer to Horus. This bronze falcon is, therefore, a material record of an ancient pilgrim’s prayer.
Many museum collections feature bronze falcon statuettes like this one, including the Louvre in Paris, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, the Staatliche Museen in Berlin, the Brooklyn Museum, and the British Museum, London.
Falcon statuette/sarcophagus, 664-332 B.C., Late Period, Egypt, Bronze, H: 23 cm, L: 23.3 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris, © 2014 Musée du Louvre, Dist. GrandPalaisRmn / Benjamin Soligny
Horus the god
Falcons were linked to the god Horus, the son of Isis and Osiris. One of the most important gods in the Egyptian pantheon, Horus was worshipped from at least late prehistoric Egypt until the Ptolemaic and Roman Periods. His battle to regain his throne from his uncle Seth, who had killed his father Osiris, was seen as symbolic of the pharaoh’s victory over Egypt’s enemies.
orus was also seen as the uniter of the Two Kingdoms of Egypt and the maintainer of order. He therefore represented the concept of balance, which was highly valued by ancient Egyptians. As such, he was associated with kingship and the pharaoh came to be viewed as a representation of Horus on earth.
One of Horus’s names translates as ‘Horus the Great’ or ‘Horus the Elder’. This is written in hieroglyphs as ḥr.w, or ‘falcon’, 𓅃, and is also translated as ‘the distant one’ or ‘one who is above, over’. Horus was often depicted as a falcon or a man with a falcon’s head. The falcon, therefore, became a symbol of divine kingship, and is often depicted wearing the Double Crown of Egypt (seen in the example below) or the sun disc in statues and paintings. Horus was also god of the sky, with the sun as his right eye and the moon as his left. In his falcon form, Horus flew the sun and moon in their journey across the sky, with outspread wings protecting the earth below. The Eye of Horus, or wedjat-eye, was a powerful apotropaic symbol for ancient Egyptians.

Horus Falcon-Form Coffin, 664–30 B.C.E.. Bronze, gold, 11 3/4 x 2 3/4 x 11 1/2 in. (29.8 x 7 x 29.2 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 05.394. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum (Gavin Ashworth, photographer))
From the collection of art historian Dr. Emil Hultmark
This fine falcon was previously in the collection of Dr. Emil Hultmark (1872-1943), a Swedish art historian, collector, donor, and patron of the arts. Trained under art historians Heinrich Wöfflin and Adolph Goldschmidt, Hultmark’s doctoral thesis on Swedish painter Carl Frederik von Breda and its accompanying catalogue remains one of the seminal texts on Von Breda’s oeuvre. Hultmark also compiled a formidably large archive of Swedish artists and craftsmen, and a library covering the entire history of Swedish art. His personal collection, comprising paintings, sculptures, engravings, furniture, textiles, silver, bronzes, and faience, set out to encompass the full history of art in every country of the world, from ancient times to his lifetime.

Emil Hultmarks Samling, Kungliga Akademien för de fria konsterna, Stockholm, 1942, no. 596, p. 73, pl. 34.

Photograph featuring the Horus from Maj Sterner, ‘Fil. dr. och fru Emil Hultmarks hem. Birger Jarlsgatan 32, Stockholm’, Svenska Hem I Ord Och Bilder, ed. Stig M H-son Björkman (1936), p. 176.
This fine example of a bronze Horus sold to a private collector at TEFAF New York art fair in 2025. David Aaron will once again exhibit at TEFAF New York in 2026 and can be found at stand 212.

The Hultmark Horus at TEFAF New York 2025. Image: Courtesy of David Aaron, photographed by Jitske NapPublished 27/05/2025
Read time: 3min
Dinosaurs, with their awe-inspiring scale and dramatic mass extinction, continue to capture the public imagination like few other subjects. They are both nostalgic and timeless, igniting a sense of wonder across generations. From popular culture to cutting-edge palaeontology, dinosaurs consistently draw global attention, both in science and the arts.
Among them, few are as instantly recognisable as the Triceratops. With its broad bony frill, parrot-like beak and three distinctive facial horns, it has become an icon of prehistoric life. The genus name means “three-horned face”, and the creature’s appearance is both formidable and strangely endearing.
The first known remains of a Triceratops were discovered in 1887 in Colorado. Initially believed to belong to a species of extinct bison, the fossilised horns were re-identified by American palaeontologist Othniel Charles Marsh, who formally described Triceratops horridus in 1889 and Triceratops prorsus in 1890. A fully mounted skeleton, named Hatcher, the first to go on display, was later unveiled by the Smithsonian Institution in 1905 and remains one of the centrepieces of their dinosaur collection.

Hatcher, the first mounted and exhibited Triceratops, went on display in 1905, Smithsonian Institution.
At our gallery on Berkeley Square, we are privileged to host a real Triceratops skull; an extraordinary specimen named Maple. Estimated to be from a sub-adult, nearing full maturity, Maple’s skull measures a remarkable 181 cm from jaw to frill. It is believed that Triceratops reached full maturity around ten years of age, making juvenile and subadult fossils particularly scarce.
Maple was discovered in 2019 in the fossil-rich badlands of Montana and excavated throughout 2020. Following discovery, the skull underwent meticulous preparation, including expert conservation and reconstruction.
Palaeontologists assess age not only by size but also by the development of certain cranial features such as epoccipitals, small bony projections that line the top edge of the frill. These ridges, along with bone texture and suture fusion, help scientists estimate growth stages and age at death.
We were honoured to exhibit Cera, a smaller juvenile Triceratops, closer in size to the BBC's Triceratops Clover at Frieze Masters in 2022, which had these epoccipital bones still visible, where it received notable attention, including a feature in The Art Newspaper. The overwhelming public and media interest affirmed what we already knew- dinosaurs are as culturally relevant today as they were 66 million years ago.

'Cera', A smaller example of a 'Juvenile Triceratops Skull' on show at Frieze Masters, London, in 2022. David Aaron Ltd
Triceratops is known for having had one of the largest skulls of any land animal in history. "It took up about a quarter of its whole body length, which is an unbelievably big skull," notes Dr Paul Barrett, palaeontologist at the Natural History Museum.
Today, fragments of Triceratops fossils are housed in museums and private collections around the world. However, few offer the opportunity to come face-to-face with a skull as complete and striking as Maple’s.
If you are in Mayfair, we welcome you to visit our gallery and experience this extraordinary piece of natural history in person. Maple is waiting.


Published 16/05/2025
Read time: 2min
Our exhibition began successfully with the sale of the 'Hultmark Horus', an exceptional Egyptian bronze falcon. The piece attracted significant attention from art collectors and the media prior to opening day. This interest resulted in its sale for £520,000 during the collector's preview. The hollow-cast bronze falcon served as a votive offering and possibly a ceremonial object during 663-525 B.C. in ancient Egypt. It was previously in the Private collection of Swedish collector Dr. Emil Hultmark (1872-1943), and the piece was photographed in his home in 1942.

The Hultmark Horus, 663-525 B.C., Saitic Period, Egypt, Bronze, H: 22.7 cm. David Aaron Ltd

The Hultmark Horus, 663-525 B.C., Saitic Period, Egypt, Bronze, H: 22.7 cm. David Aaron Ltd
It was a particularly rewarding experience for us to bring such an important example of ancient Egyptian culture to New York "Being part of TEFAF's elite roster of exhibitors has been an amazing experience," noted Director Salomon Aaron. "The response to our collection has exceeded our expectations, and we appreciate the warm welcome from the New York art community."
We would like to thank the TEFAF organising committee for hosting another fantastic art show; Jitske Nap for the excellent photographs; the vetting committee for their professionalism; the stand-builders and shipping agents; the press team for coordinating our media interactions; and all the TEFAF staff who worked throughout the week and contributed to the quality of the experience.


David Aaron, Stand 212, TEFAF NY, 2025. David Aaron Ltd
Published 08/05/2025
Read time: 5min

Jacob Epstein at work on one of the statues for the British Medical Association building, The Sketch (8 July 1908)
In Paris, Epstein studied sculpture at the Académie Julian and the École des Beaux-Arts; though his studies ended prematurely at the latter after his studio was destroyed as punishment for his refusal to perform menial tasks for the entrants in the Prix de Rome Concours. He visited the Louvre and saw artworks from outside the Western canon that were less known in Europe at that time, including early Greek work, Cycladic sculpture, the Lady of Elche bust, and the limestone bust of Akhenaten. At the Trocadéro and the Musée Cernusci, he observed what was then known as ‘primitive’ sculpture and Chinese art. In 1905, Epstein moved to London, where he would live for most of the rest of his life – he married Margaret Dunlop in 1906, and took British citizenship in 1911. Epstein spent a great deal of time in the British Museum, studying the Elgin Marbles and other Greek, Egyptian, African, and Polynesian sculptures, and used his observations to develop his own sculptural technique.
In 1907-8, Epstein was invited by architect Charles Holden to carve eighteen over-life-size figures for the façade of the British Medical Association’s new headquarters in The Strand. For this work, Epstein drew from the ancient and ‘primitive’ works he had studied, and suggested a series of nudes, ‘to express in sculpture the great primal facts of men and women’. According to his 1940 autobiography, Let There Be Sculpture, Epstein was taken completely by surprise at the level of vitriol and controversy sparked by this commission. Though many known figures and artists defended his pieces, public outcry made Epstein a household name and was to follow him throughout his career. For instance, the tomb he carved with Eric Gill for Oscar Wilde in Paris in 1911-12 and his 1915 Rock Drill sculpture prompted similar responses. One critic described Epstein as ‘a sculptor in revolt, who is in deadly conflict with the ideas of current sculpture’. His contemporary Henry Moore praised Epstein for unflinchingly bearing the weight of prejudice and hostility to forge a path for those sculptors who followed him, and expressed great gratitude for Epstein’s courage.

Oscar Wilde's tomb, located in Père Lachaise Cemetery, Paris.

‘Pedestrians on the Strand eagerly gazing up at the building of the British Medical Association, in search of the statues which the papers said were rather shocking and ought to be suppressed.’ From The Bystander (1st July, 1908).

Three nude male figures from the Ages of Man series, former British Medical Association building, now Zimbabwe House, The Strand, London.

Signs advertising Epstein’s Jacob and the Angel (1940-1) at Louis Tussaud’s Waxworks, Blackpool

'Jacob Epstein Collector', front cover showing the interior of Epstein's home and some of his collection of African art. Published by Associazione Poro (Milan, Italy, 1989)


Portrait of Jacob Epstein, Geoffrey Ireland. Ancient Egyptian items from Epstein’s collection can be seen on the mantlepiece behind him. National Portrait Gallery.

Pregnant Cycladic Idol, 2500-2000 B.C., Greece, Marble, H: 14.5 cm, previously in the Private Collection of Sir Jacob Epstein. David Aaron Ltd

In the 1939 exhibition catalogue, Epstein showcased multiple works, including busts of children and the sculpture of 'ADAM'.

The monumental sculpture of 'ADAM' was later on show in Blackpool. The exhibition received mixed reviews, and a Pathé newsreel shows crowds attending, including a woman fainting.

Cycladic Idol, 2500-2000 B.C., Greece, Marble, H: 21.4 cm, previously in the Private Collection of Sir Jacob Epstein. David Aaron Ltd.
Published 08/05/2025
Read time: 3min

Connecting trains in Ponte-Leccia station. Mixed right for Ajaccio towed by a 031 Fives-Lille locomotive, circa 1882 (Collection J.RENAUD)
The group contains:
-one dagger
-one crescent-shaped bronze that may have been a belt-buckle
-one rounded pommel
-one disc with a projecting spike, which may have been part of a horses harness or brooch
-three bow fibulae (brooches) of various sizes
-three simple rings of differing sizes, possibly a form of proto-currency.
The style of these objects suggests a burial date of around 900 BCE. Then-director of the Musée préhistorique et gallo-romain in Strasbourg, Dr. Robert Forrer, published this group in an 8-page essay in the bulletin of the Société Préhistorique Française in 1924.



R Forrer, ‘Un trésor de bronzes préhistoriques decouvert en Corse’, Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 10, 1924, pp. 224-232.
Why were these pieces buried together?
It is clear that these pieces were intentionally buried as a group by someone in ancient history. What is not clear is why. One theory is that they formed part of a funerary hoard, perhaps together with several other buried objects along the banks of the Gravona. Another is that they were a trader’s wares or a warrior’s treasure and were buried for safekeeping.
The two possible discovery sites along the river are both in inland mountainous regions. Forrer’s theory was that the bronzes were brought in from Sardinia, via Ajaccio and up the river, and were the property of a Sherden warrior. However, recent research indicates that the Torrean civilisation in the south of Corsica – previously thought to have begun in the second millennium B.C. when Sherden warriors landed on the island – was in fact an indigenous population. There is at least one confirmed example of the distinctive megalithic towers (torri) built by this civilisation in the Gravona valley, north-east of the capital. Therefore, these bronzes may have been produced near the discovery site.
What are they?
Some of the bronzes require no explanation, such as the dagger in typical late Bronze Age style, and the fibulae, which closely resemble similar brooches now in major museums.
Some of the pieces are, however, less easily understood. One is the crescent-shaped object adorned with five evenly-spaced raised round rivets, a short cross with rounded ends extends from the inner centre of the arc. The rivets and hook could have served as a means of affixing the bronze in place, suggesting that this object may have been a belt buckle, or perhaps part of a scabbard or horse harness.
Another is the circular disc, with a large, rounded spike projecting from its centre. This form resembles the shields held by warriors in Nuragic bronze statues, possibly linking the pieces to the Sardinian warriors from Forrer’s theory. Small holes are pierced around the circumference, four of which contain chain links, suggesting that this disc was previously part of a larger object. The disc may have been a phalera on a horse harness or perhaps the centrepiece of a brooch, as in a contemporaneous example in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (2007.498.2).
The small pommel in the form of a hollow ovoid has one hole running through its length and another smaller hold at the side. These would allow a stick to be inserted through the pommel and held in place by a small nail, so that the pommel could be wielded as a part of a sceptre or other weapon. As it weighs in at a very light 69 grams, however, it seems most likely that the pommel would have been purely decorative – an ancient warrior wouldn’t have been able to do much damage with a 3.7 cm bronze!
Most puzzling are the three rings, each formed from a single bronze rod bent into a circle. Although they resemble Bronze Age bracelets from other sites, the largest is only 7.7 cm in diameter, and the others are much smaller, at 4.8 cm and 3.7 cm. These smallest two, would definitely not fit over anyone’s wrist. Forrer suggested one possible explanation of their purpose. He argued that, due to their simple forms and the relationships between their weights (the weight of the smallest is about 2/3 of the second smallest, which is approximately 1/4 of the largest), these rings may have been a form of currency, of the kind found in other Bronze Age settlements in Europe.
The Corsican Hoard raises many questions about the ancient society that produced it. We can only speculate as to who owned the pieces and why they were buried, and what purpose the bronzes served. Perhaps they hold the key to unravelling the secrets of Bronze Age Corsica.
Published 07/05/2025
Read time: 3min
Monumental Cycladic Torso of an Idol, possibly by the Copenhagen Master, 2500-2000 B.C., Bronze Age, Greece, Marble, H: 32 cm. David Aaron Ltd
The enduring appeal of such figures lies partly in their ambiguity. Whether carved in marble, stone or formed from terracotta, these objects resist precise interpretation. It is presumed their purpose was religious or symbolic, but the exact meanings are largely lost. What does remain is an uncanny sense of presence, sharpened by the abstraction. Collectors of Piravend idols from the Caucasus or Amlash figurines from Iron Age Iran are drawn to the same qualities that captivate visitors to major exhibitions: a tension between the deeply ancient and the strikingly modern.
In recent years, museum exhibitions have helped people see the connections between ancient abstract idols from different parts of the world. By displaying figures from places like the Cyclades, Anatolia and Mesopotamia side by side, curators have shown that many early cultures shared a similar approach to representing the human form. The exhibition Idols: The Power of Images, held at the Fondazione Prada in Venice in 2019, assembled over 80 works from major archaeological museums and private collections; the curators traced a visual lineage of abstraction in human representation from the Neolithic period through to the 3rd millennium B.C.

The ‘Gillet’ Piravend Idol, Iron Age II-III, Circa 1000-650 B.C., North-Western Iran, Bronze, H: 22.8cm, W: 14.3cm, David Aaron Ltd
Sir Leonard Woolley’s excavations at Tell Brak in the 1930s yielded hundreds of the so-called Eye Idols: small, flat stone plaques with exaggerated ocular features. These objects, believed to date from the 4th millennium B.C, have no known counterparts in contemporary traditions. Their stark design – geometric, linear and hypnotic – is one of the earliest attestations of abstraction in human form. In modern contexts, they could be mistaken for works by Paul Klee or Jean Arp.
This convergence has not gone unnoticed. The Cycladic figures of the Early Bronze Age Aegean, excavated in the early 20th century, had a formative influence on the European avant-garde. Artists such as Modigliani and Brâncuși drew directly from their smooth, faceless silhouettes. In the 1950s and 60s, major collectors including Stavros Niarchos and Christian Zervos amassed large groups of these works, recognising not only their archaeological value but their aesthetic resonance with post-war modernism.
Interest in such idols has persisted and evolved, collecting these objects often reflects a taste for the timeless: a desire to own works that embody the minimalism of form. Private collectors may acquire an Amlash terracotta idol as an ethnographic curiosity, and also as a sculptural object that could just as easily sit in a contemporary gallery. The art market has responded accordingly, with well-provenanced examples, especially from former major collections such as the Erlenmeyer or Niggeler, commanding strong prices due to their rarity and visual power.
Academic interest, meanwhile, has turned to broader interpretative frameworks. Scholars such as Colin Renfrew have argued for the importance of viewing these figures not in isolation, but within their original ritual and spatial contexts. Ultimately, the appeal of collecting abstract ancient idols rests on a paradox. These are the most silent of artefacts, mute, unknowable, contextually remote, and yet they speak directly to modern sensibilities. Their mystery is not a barrier but an invitation, and their reduction of the human form to its essentials continues to inspire a potent blend of scholarly respect and aesthetic fascination.
Published 06/05/2025
Read time: 5min
Discovering Iron Age Amlash
Finds from this region have passed through the small market town of Amlash on their way into the antiquities markets of Iran, Europe and the US since the 1930s, prompting official excavations licensed by the Iranian government. In 1960, a team of Japanese archaeologists from Tokyo University led by Namio Egami excavated tomb sites in Deylaman. Here they found bronze and iron weaponry, horse equipage, mirrors, gold and silver jewellery, and bronze and ceramic figures of animals. Similar objects were found during the 1961 excavation of the Marlik tomb site on the Sefid Rud by renowned Iranian archaeologist Ezat Negahban. The fifty-three tomb chambers of Marlik Tepe, dated between 1100 and 800 B.C., contained many gold and silver vessels, weapons, jewellery, and grey- and red-ware ceramic vessels. Other ceramic finds from the nearby site of Kalaruz and the more distant Kalar Dasht share many characteristics with those found at Marlik.

Ezat Negahban with finds from Marlik Tepe, The Encyclopædia Iranica
It quickly became clear that these archaeological remains provided evidence of a long-forgotten civilisation. In Negahban’s words, ‘we began to realise that we had discovered the burial mound of a culture that had completely vanished from human memory. The masterpieces of art discovered in these roughly constructed tomb chambers seemed to indicate that this must have been the burial ground of the royal families of this forgotten kingdom’. The objects Negahban discovered at Marlik were of such great variety that he said that if he hadn’t seen them emerge from the same site with his own eyes, he would not have believed it. The case has been made that some of the metalware and jewellery from these digs originated in earlier periods, or were goods traded from other cultures. It is, therefore, predominantly the ceramic vessels and statuettes which are deemed truly representative of Amlash culture.

Amlash Idol, 1st Millennium B.C., Amlash, Central Asia, Terracotta, H: 45cm, David Aaron Ltd
The ceramic vessels and statuettes of both humans and animals from this region are by far the most important source we have on the Amlash culture of Iron-Age Iran. The many animal figures usually represent the region’s native fauna, such as rams, horses, stags, boars, oxen, and ibex. Human representations are also common and generally found at burial sites, suggesting that they may represent specific individuals or deities. Much of what has survived seems to have held spiritual or ritual functions, such as these votive idols, and libation vessels.
Modern Fascination with the Ancient
Since their appearance on the antiquities market in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Amlash ceramics have been of great interest to modern collectors and museums throughout the world. Their abstracted but immediately recognisable silhouettes appealed greatly to the early twentieth-century avant-garde. Artists were drawn to what they saw as a skilful reduction of figures to pure form. For instance, Pablo Picasso, who had been fascinated with the bull and bull-fighting from an early age, was known to have owned several bull-shaped libation vessels of Amlash type. A clear line of influence can be seen from these to Picasso’s ceramic works, such as his Standing Bull (1947).

The 'George Sand' Bull, 1st Millennium B.C. Terracotta, H: 37cm. David Aaron Ltd

Picasso, Standing Bull, 1947, Musée Picasso, Antibes.
In 1961, a large travelling exhibition of Iranian Art opened in Paris. ‘7000 Years of Iranian Art’ featured many fine examples of Amlash ceramics and metalwork, and brought them to the notice of the general public. Charles K. Wilkinson, then-Curator Emeritus of Near Eastern Art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, wrote that, ‘Many of these objects of unglazed earthenware, grotesque in form and visually arresting, appealed strongly to people who ask of art something more than mere prettiness and mirror reflections of creatures and men of this world’. Although this was Amlash art’s Western debut, many of the pieces in the exhibition were loaned from private collections, where they had already been snapped up by keen connoisseurs.
One of the most arresting anthropomorphic Amlash figures to ever appear on the market is this large and intact steatopygous figure, 31 cm high, with an unmistakably female form (pictured below). Full hips swell below pronounced buttocks, tapering above to very narrow shoulders and thinning to two circular feet at the base. This produces a striking silhouette. The features are abstracted, with stylised limbs positioned below the two clearly modelled breasts. Five incised lines decorate the neck, probably representing jewellery, and small round ears protrude on either side of the head. The pierced ears may have originally been adorned with bronze or gold earrings, as other Marlik figures were.

Steatopygous Idol, Iran, 1st millennium BC, Terracotta, H: 31 cm, David Aaron Ltd
This idol was one of the centrepieces of an exhibition of Amlash sculpture at Betty Parsons Gallery, New York, in 1963. Betty Parsons (1900-1982) was an American artist, art dealer, and collector known for her early promotion of Abstract Expressionism. Her New York gallery featured works by Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, Ad Reinhardt, Clyfford Still, and Barnett Newman, long before they achieved mainstream popularity. Invitees of her 1963 exhibition included cubist sculptor Jacques Lipchitz and Joseph Epstein, editor of The American Scholar. In the exhibition catalogue, Barnett Newman wrote that Amlash art is ‘unlike any sculpture known’ and that, ‘It is becoming more and more apparent that to understand Modern art, one must have an appreciation of the primitive arts, for just as modern art stands as an island of revolt in the stream of western European aesthetics, the many primitive art traditions stand apart as authentic aesthetic accomplishments’.

Poster advertising the exhibition curated by Betty Parsons, 1963
In 1964, the Jerrold Morris International Gallery, Toronto, possibly inspired by the positive press coverage of Parson’s exhibition, held his own exhibition of Amlash art. Many of the works featured in both exhibitions were lent by Samuel Dubiner and Barry Kernerman of Galerie Israel, Tel Aviv. Dubiner remains to this day one of the most preeminent collectors of Bronze Age Iranian artworks. In the 1970s, he produced, wrote, and narrated a series of short films about Amlash art entitled The Amlash Connection, featuring many pieces from his private collection.
Amlash ceramics continue to have a strong appeal today. Several examples featured in the 2021 ‘Epic Iran’ exhibition at the Victoria & Albert Museum, London, including a humped bull from the Ashmolean Museum and a steatopygic female figurine from the Sarikhani Collection.












